Despite Push on ‘Ban the Box,’ Nondisclosure Is The Best Option

With increased calls nationwide to reduce barriers for ex-offenders as they re-enter society, much of the conversation has centered on “Ban the Box,” an effort to remove questions on employment applications that gauge whether someone has been convicted of a crime.

Earlier today, Right on Crime policy analyst Greg Glod appeared on KUT-Austin to discuss “Ban the Box” within the larger context of re-entry initiatives–particularly as the federal government is poised to eliminate the box for federal job applicants–and also discussed “orders of nondisclosure,” an alternative to the practice recently passed in Texas.

Orders of nondisclosure (OND) allow certain low-level ex-offenders to petition a court to have their records sealed from the view of most public or private entities, excepting law enforcement and other sensitive industries. Because individuals must seek an OND–as opposed to “Ban the Box,” which is a mandate on businesses–this encourages ex-offenders to accept personal responsibility for themselves, as they must remain law-abiding throughout the entire process.

In this interview, Glod provides a substantive, free-market perspective on the difference between federal and private employers, and why orders of nondisclosure are a better option than banning the box:



A ‘Weaponized’ Justice Department Demonstrates Need For Mens Rea Reform

Right on Crime | November 3, 2015
Last Friday, Ilya Shapiro and Randal John Meyer of the Cato Institute published an article at National Review—“Obama’s Weaponized Justice Department”–highlighting an increasing tendency of the department under the…
Connect With Right on Crime
STAY Informed: