THE ISSUE. Thousands of harmless activities are now classified as crimes in the United States. These are not typical common law crimes such as murder, rape, or theft. Instead they encompass a series of business activities such as importing orchids without the proper paperwork, shipping lobster tails in plastic bags, and even failing to return a library book. There are over 4,000 existing federal criminal laws. (The exact number of laws is unknown because the attorneys at Congressional Research Service who were assigned to count them ran out of resources before they could complete the herculean task.)
In addition to the profusion of federal statutory crimes, there are additional state crimes (Texas alone has over 1,700), and federal regulatory offenses (approximately 300,000). The creation of these often unknowable and redundant crimes, the federalization of certain crimes traditionally prosecuted at the state level, and the removal of traditional mens rea requirements all contribute to a relentless trend known as overcriminalization.
THE IMPACT. Significant differences between criminal and civil law make criminal law an overly blunt instrument for regulating non-fraudulent business activities. Whereas administrative rulemaking and civil proceedings may utilize a cost-benefit analysis to evaluate the conduct at issue, no such balancing occurs in criminal proceedings because, theoretically, criminal law covers only those activities that are inherently wrong.
Also, because criminal law is enforced entirely by state prosecution, it tends to minimize the role of the victim. Indeed, the prototypical “regulatory” offense does not include anyone actually being harmed as an element of the offense. Finally, civil and criminal law have traditionally been distinguished by the requirement that a criminal must have a guilty state of mind. An increasing number of regulatory offenses nevertheless dispense with this requirement or require mere criminal negligence rather than intentional, knowing, or reckless conduct.
THE CONSERVATIVE SOLUTION.
—Stop creating new criminal offenses as a method of regulating business activities. Regulation is better handled through fines and market forces, not the heavy stigma of criminal sanctions
—Avoid licensing new occupations and revise laws to eliminate criminal penalties that are currently associated with many occupations.
—Ensure that an appropriate culpable mental state is included in the elements of all offenses.
—Return the responsibility for prosecuting and punishing traditional crimes to the states.
—Revise criminal laws to remove ambiguities and consolidate redundant laws to help prevent prosecutorial abuse.
Michael Haugen | July 12, 2016
Michael Haugen | May 6, 2016
Joe Luppino-Esposito | April 15, 2016
Michael Haugen | April 1, 2016
Joe Luppino-Esposito | March 10, 2016
Michael Haugen | February 10, 2016
Michael Haugen | January 14, 2016
Joe Luppino-Esposito | January 13, 2016
Michael Haugen | January 12, 2016
Greg Glod | December 30, 2015
Michael Haugen | November 3, 2015
Dianna Muldrow | September 16, 2015
Michael Haugen | September 2, 2015
Michael Haugen | August 12, 2015
Michael Haugen | July 15, 2015
Arresting the Growth of Criminal Law in Texas by the Texas Public Policy Foundation
Big Brother on the Beat: The Expanding Federalization of Crime by Ed Meese in the Texas Review of Law and Politics
The Burden of Immigration Laws on Business by the Texas Public Policy Foundation
Can Someone Please Turn on the Lights? Bringing Transparency to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act by Michael B. Mukasey and James C. Dunlop in Engage
Criminal Law Checklist for Federal Legislators by the Heritage Fouondation, Texas Public Policy Foundation, Washington Legal Foundation, and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Criminal Law Checklist for State Legislators by the Texas Public Policy Foundation
Criminal Minds: Defining Culpability in Michigan Criminal Law by the Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Engulfed by Environmental Crimes: Overcriminalization on the Gulf Coast by the Texas Public Policy Foundation
How Many Laws Did You Break This Week?: Overcriminalization in Colorado by the Independence Institute
Mens Rea and State Crimes by the Federalist Society
Not Just for Criminals: Overcriminalization in the Lone Star State by the Texas Public Policy Foundation
Overextending the Criminal Law by the Cato Institute
Solutions for America: Overcriminalization by the Heritage Foundation
Time To Rethink What’s a Crime: So-Called Crimes are Here, There, and Everywhere by the Texas Public Policy Foundation
Twelve Steps for Overcoming Overcriminalization by the Texas Public Policy Foundation
Without Intent: How Congress is Eroding the Criminal Intent Requirement in Federal Law by the Heritage Foundation and National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
Working With Conviction: Criminal Offenses as Barriers to Entering Licensed Occupations in Texas by the Texas Public Policy Foundation