fbpx

PUBLICATIONS

Pretrial, Fines & Fees

THE ISSUE. Pretrial incarceration occurs when someone who has yet to be convicted of a crime is locked up while awaiting trial. Jail stays can range from a few days to a few years depending on the backlog of cases. Pretrial incarceration was originally purposed with detaining defendants who present a legitimate threat to public safety or who have a track record of failing to appear for court dates. However, it’s now largely determined based on inability to pay fines or fees such as monetary bail, traffic tickets, or court fees. 

THE IMPACT. Taxpayers are footing the bill for jail stays that often times have an adverse effect on public safety. Research shows that, especially in regards to low-risk defendants, even brief jail stays can increase the chance of committing another crime in the future. A contributing factor for this is that a few days in a cell can lead to being laid off, losing housing, making it difficult to find and keep meaningful employment.

When someone who has mental health issues is locked up pretrial it can compound their situation. The same can be said for people who display signs of substance abuse.

Lastly, this can also create a vicious cycle of court debt. Once someone is locked up because they are unable to afford a fine or fee, they tend to rack up additional costs that are attached to court proceedings. Failure to pay this debt can result in more jail time for an indigent individual while defendants with thicker wallets are able to walk free.

Ability to pay a certain amount of money is not a strong predictor of intention to show up in court, nor does it reveal the level of risk of committing another crime.

THE CONSERVATIVE SOLUTION.
— Public safety must be placed at the forefront of the criminal justice system by determining pretrial incarceration based on risk. Judges can gain a bigger picture of each individual and make decisions on a case-by-case basis if they utilize risk assessment tools that take criminal records into account.
— Indigence should be considered when assigning fines or fees.
— Give police officers the option to divert low-risk defendants with mental health or substance abuse issues to treatment programs rather than jail.
—Offer alternatives to incarceration for unpaid fines or fees such as payment plans, community service, and digital court reminders.

Louisiana Passed Justice Reforms in 2017, But How Much Is Being Utilized?

Scott Peyton | March 16, 2020
This year we saw the LSU Tigers take home a National Championship. For the first time in many years, maybe decades, the Tigers had an unbelievable defense, offense and…

Oklahoma Governor Makes Reforming Fines and Fees a Priority

Joe Griffin | May 9, 2019
This week, Governor Kevin Stitt announced a number of Criminal Justice Reform priorities that he wants passed in the last weeks of session. This is a tremendous signal from…

Grand Jury Reform in Texas

Haley Holik | May 3, 2019
In Texas, any person accused of committing a felony has the right to a grand jury. Without historical context, though, one may wonder why Texas even bothered enshrining such…

Confronting the Burden of Fines and Fees on Fine-Only Offenses in Texas: Recent Reforms and Next Steps

Right on Crime | May 1, 2019
Marc Levin and Haley Holik discuss the impact of fine-only offenses on offenders who are unable to pay. With so many citizens jailed because of an inability to pay,…

Louisiana Criminal Justice Reform

Greg Glod | April 30, 2019
In 2017, the Justice Reinvestment Initiative (JRI) reforms were passed with overwhelming bi-partisan support in the Louisiana Legislature and signed into law by Governor Edwards.  Over a year and…

Oklahoma Poll Reveals Strong Support for Criminal Justice Reform

Right on Crime | April 5, 2019
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE APRIL 5, 2019 CONTACT: Andrew Speno 405-315-5924 aspeno@rightoncrime.com Oklahoma City, OK — A poll commissioned by Right on Crime and conducted by Ascend Perspectives revealed a…

Excessive Fines and Fees Are Hindering Reentry in Louisiana

Scott Peyton | February 28, 2019
Act 260 (HB 249) is one of ten bills that make up Louisiana’s 2017 Justice Reinvestment Initiative (JRI) reforms.  The goal of Act 260 is “to ensure that criminal justice…

Bail Reform in Texas

Kaycie Alexander | February 27, 2019
The current criminal justice system in Texas leaves many inmates without hope of reentry into society. Seventy-five percent of those in county jails are awaiting trial; and according to…

Pretrial Justice in Tennessee

Julie Warren | February 13, 2019
We are all familiar with the tenet that every defendant is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Americans may not be well versed in the myriad protocols…

Rethinking Pretrial Justice in the Pelican State

Scott Peyton | December 19, 2018
Louisiana recently shed the title of having the highest incarceration rate in the country, and now it is time to take a look at the state of pretrial detention…

Florida Bar Pretrial Panel Update

Chelsea Murphy | November 9, 2018
The Florida Bar’s first-ever Criminal Justice Summit brought together a diverse group of leaders to provide in-depth education and discussion on key criminal justice issues. Attendees shared ideas and…

Tulsa County sees success in criminal justice reforms after one year

Joe Griffin | September 21, 2018
Despite a series of reforms passed by the legislature, Oklahoma remains a negative example to rest of the nation for the perils of over-incarceration. This week, however, the Tulsa…
Connect With Right on Crime
STAY Informed:
www.scriptsell.net